Major privacy alert for Android users
mastodon.sdf.org/@jack/1139522…
#Privacy #Android
You remember #Apple scanning all images on your #mobile device?If you have an #Android #phone, a new app that doesn't appear in your menu has been automatically and silently installed (or soon will be) by #Google. It is called #AndroidSystemSafetyCore and does exactly the same - scan all images on your device as well as all incoming ones (via messaging). The new spin is that it does so "to protect your #privacy".
You can uninstall this app safely via System -> Apps.
developers.google.com/android/…
SpaceLifeForm
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •@jack
Do I have to get a newer phone to get this feature? /s
Ra
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf Ra • • •GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •@Ra See grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/….
GrapheneOS
2025-02-08 17:17:03
霖 リン
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •Noxy 🐾🏳️🌈
Als Antwort auf Ra • • •@Ra @jack @GrapheneOS nope.
no such trash has shown up on my Pixel 8 Pro running GrapheneOS.
GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf Noxy 🐾🏳️🌈 • • •GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •@noxypaws @Ra See grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/….
GrapheneOS
2025-02-08 17:17:03
GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •jonny (good kind)
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •d@nny disc@ mc²
Als Antwort auf jonny (good kind) • • •GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf d@nny disc@ mc² • • •@hipsterelectron @jonny
Here's a thread on what it is:
grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/…
It's tiring going through endless news cycles of fake privacy and security threats and we don't really have the energy to deal with it more than that.
We're dealing with ongoing attacks on GrapheneOS on X by several different charlatans/scammers and we've been focused on dealing with that rather than writing about something like this. Threw together a quick thread about what it is though.
GrapheneOS
2025-02-08 17:17:03
Bitslingers-R-Us
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •"The app doesn't provide client-side scanning used to report things to Google or anyone else. It provides on-device machine learning models usable by applications to classify content as being spam, scams, malware, etc."
Forgive me if I'm not understanding correctly, but to clarify:
That statement could be misconstrued to suggest that "on-device machine learning models usable by applications to classify content" is different and distinct from "client-side scanning". To clarify, those're two ways of saying the same thing, with one being more specific. Do you really intend to just point out that it doesn't report things to Google or anyone else by default, and/or that the "client side scanning" is a scan-on-request thing, and not a let's-scan-the-whole-device-by-default thing?
What's stopping any app from using the output of the "on-device machine learning models" to report to third parties?
GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf Bitslingers-R-Us • • •GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •jonny (good kind)
Als Antwort auf GrapheneOS • • •I've said it before and I'll say it again, really appreciate what you do.
leo vriska
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •5 new protections on Google Messages to help keep you safe
Google Online Security Blogleo vriska
Als Antwort auf leo vriska • • •nullagent
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •For folks looking for exactly how the Android client side image scanning works or if it's present see the below. 👇🏿
partyon.xyz/@nullagent/1139663…
nullagent (@nullagent@partyon.xyz)
PartyOnteilten dies erneut
Freight hat dies geteilt.
nullagent
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •A few folks are questioning if AI scanning like what Android is doing can be missused. The last time a similar feature was coming to Apple's iOS the media rightly described it as an extremely dangerous warrantless surveillance tool.
Regardless of what Android developers intended this client side scanner to do it will be enlisted by governments of the world to spy on you and break strong encryption.
9to5mac.com/2023/09/01/csam-sc…
#privacy #cybersecurity #apple #android #ai #clientsidescanning
Apple finally admits the CSAM scanning flaw we all pointed out
Ben Lovejoy (9to5Mac)teilten dies erneut
Freight hat dies geteilt.
nullagent
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •And if you look at the current reporting on Apple and government requests for your private data...
"The encrypted data of millions of Apple users worldwide could reportedly be handed over to the government.
The Home Office has ordered Apple to let it access encrypted data stored in its cloud service, The Washington Post reported."
Demanding access to every last bit you have in any cloud is normal government stuff these days
metro.co.uk/2025/02/08/privacy…
#UKPol #EU #UK #Apple #Privacy #HomeOffice
Privacy fears for millions after government demands access to messages and photos
Luke Alsford (Metro)食 Shoku the MN Wolf
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •nullagent
Als Antwort auf 食 Shoku the MN Wolf • • •The system definitely scans photos for nudity already. Today they claim the feature only runs on certain apps but as we've seen with Apple and various world governments there's a major tendency for these sorts of features to creep into all of your content whether that's what Google intended in their first release or not.
security.googleblog.com/2024/1…
@TheMNWolf @jack
5 new protections on Google Messages to help keep you safe
Google Online Security BlogToken Sane Person
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •@TheMNWolf @jack So according to this it warns the user about nudity, but does NOT notify Google.
Of course it's possible that Google is lying, but the evidence to support the main claim of surveillance isn't here.
Emil 🇵🇸
Als Antwort auf Token Sane Person • • •@tokensane @TheMNWolf @jack This!
Without any result of the scanning leaving the device I do not see the privacy implications at all.
Paperpad
Als Antwort auf Emil 🇵🇸 • • •nullagent
Als Antwort auf Paperpad • • •@paperpad @emil @tokensane @TheMNWolf @jack
Exactly. Right at a time when SMS(RCS) end-to-end security is improving isn't it odd that suddenly there's so much helpful client side AI that wants to read your messages. 🤔
Is -accidently- sending a nude really this big of a problem that ALL android users need this feature turned on by default without over night?
JustSaying
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •leo vriska
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •harmone
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •@nazokiyoubinbou @leo > And with things as they are going right now, they might not even [have to] notify you.
should be:
And with things as they are going right now, they might not even [be allowed to] notify you.
Iwillyeah
Als Antwort auf leo vriska • • •@leo @nazokiyoubinbou then why is it installing itself? 'we don't do anything, we just LOOK' does not make me any happier to have a Peeping Tom invite themselves into my garden.
I'm not disagreeing with the info you're sharing, and thank you for it, it just feels like it's maybe not the whole story.
Panicz Maciej Godek
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •the fact that some company can install an app without your consent means that no, it wasn't ;]
@nullagent @jack
Ange des ténèbres 🐈
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •I checked and I confirm it was installed on m'y phone.
Now removed 🐱
@jack
Kaito
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •Gaysis mag das.
Simon Brooke
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •@jack thanks, removed. At the same time I disabled (you can't remove) 'Android System Intelligence', which I presume is
a: what's giving all the annoying 'google assistant' stuff, and
b: what's burning up my battery so fast since the last update.
Gaysis
Als Antwort auf nullagent • •mögen das
nullagent und BrambleBearGrrrauling mögen das.
Gaysis hat dies geteilt.
GrapheneOS
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •See grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/….
GrapheneOS
2025-02-08 17:17:03
GrapheneOS
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •@jinx @jack See grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/….
GrapheneOS
2025-02-08 17:17:03
Xoa Gray
Als Antwort auf nullagent • • •@jack Honestly at this point we should just function under the assumption that any internet connected device, especially smartphones, is going to do something like this. If it's not doing it already.
It also wouldn't shock me if just removing them wasn't enough, as I'm assuming they'll reinstall themselves.