I can understand why it seems confusing. I guess someone would expect quote mark to quote comment text into reaction instead of sharing it.

Maybe someone here can find better icon for it for better #UX ?

That one would work too, but I guess pretty much any from these could be enough

2nd and 4th are imho the best fitting as I don't find much difference in "quote share" and "share" for linking someones post

Somehow I missed that "boost" is actually called "reshare" in Friendica. My bad.

I'd actually like more if (not that it would matter 😀 ):
- reshare was called boost instead
- quote share was called share instead

@Schmaker
What is boost? It is a re-sharing and should remain so named.

@Montag @8Petros [Atlas Unshrugged]_

@Schmaker
Nothing is "boosted/angekurbelt" here. It implies an intention to exaggerate something. This is something I would expect from companies that care about the attention economy. Something is happening here that I would describe as pointing to something.

@Montag @8Petros [Atlas Unshrugged]_

@Matthias ✔
As I said - I don't think it matters what do I think (I actually thought it's called boost in Friendica too until now 😀 )

To me boost feels more logical as when I share something, then it's me who shares it - not the original poster. When I boost, I give original post new (my) audience - boosting it's viewer count in process
@Montag