Launch of Social Web Foundation


Leaders of the open social networking movement have formed the Social Web Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to making connections between social platforms with the open standard protocol ActivityPub. The “social web”, also called the “Fedive

Leaders of the open social networking movement have formed the Social Web Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to making connections between social platforms with the open standard protocol ActivityPub.

The “social web”, also called the “Fediverse”, is a network of independent social platforms connected with the open standard protocol ActivityPub. Users on any platform can follow their friends, family, influencers, or brands on any other participating network.

ActivityPub was standardized by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in 2018. It has attracted over 100 software implementations, tens of thousands of supporting web sites, and tens of millions of users.

Advocates of this increased platform choice say it will bring more individual control, more innovation, and a healthier social media experience. But there is work to do: journalism, activism, and the public square remain in a state of uncertain dissonance and privacy, safety and agency remain important concerns for anyone participating in a social network.

Leadership


The founding team of SWF merges knowledge of the Fediverse with a user-centric mindset.

  • Evan Prodromou, current editor of the ActivityPub specification and author of the book “ActivityPub: Programming for the Social Web” from O’Reilly Media, is Research Director.
  • Mallory Knodel, previously CTO of the Center for Democracy and Technology and human rights and internet standards researcher, will act as Executive Director.
  • Tom Coates, product designer and entrepreneur, will serve as the organization’s Product Director.

Mallory Knodel (@ohmallory@socialwebfoundation.org) says, “To fight inequality, participate in democracy, build an equitable society and economy, we can’t rely on a few corporate-owned, profit-driven spaces. The Social Web Foundation is our best chance to establish the conditions in which the new social media operates with zero harm.”

Program


The foundation’s program will concentrate on:

  • educating general and targeted audiences about the social web
  • informing policy-makers about issues on the social web
  • enhancing and extending the ActivityPub protocol
  • building tools and plumbing to make the social web easier and more engaging to use

“With this program, The Social Web Foundation can catalyze more growth on the Fediverse while improving user experience and safety,” says founder Prodromou (@evanprodromou@socialwebfoundation.org). “Our goal is to unblock users, developers and communities so they can get the most out of their social web experience.”

Industry support


The founders are supported by advisors from the social networking world including Chris Messina, Kaliya (Identity Woman) Young and Johannes Ernst, as well as companies and Open Source projects that have implemented ActivityPub:

  • Mastodon
  • Flipboard
  • Automattic
  • Meta
  • Ghost
  • Pixelfed
  • Medium
  • IFTAS
  • Write.as
  • Fastly
  • Vivaldi
  • The BLVD

“Mastodon is committed to the Fediverse and proud to back the Social Web Foundation’s efforts to build a stronger, more open, and dynamic social web for all,” says Eugen Rochko, Founder and CEO, Mastodon (@Gargron@mastodon.social).

“Our vision for Threads has always been to make it the place for public conversation, and interoperability is an important part of that. That’s why we integrated Threads with the Fediverse through ActivityPub,” says Rob Sherman, VP and Deputy Chief of Privacy Officer at Meta (@robsherman@threads.net). “We believe that the Fediverse helps create a more diverse ecosystem that empowers users to connect, share, and learn from each other in new and innovative ways.”

“Automattic is excited about the launch of the Social Web Foundation and its mission,” says Matthias Pfefferle, Open Web Lead at Automattic, makers of WordPress.com (@pfefferle@notiz.blog) “We’re eager to collaborate with the Foundation to expand platform diversity and enhance the support for various content types—especially long-form content—within the Fediverse, fostering greater interoperability across the ecosystem.”

“We’ve been inspired by the products being developed across the Fediverse and the people we’ve had the pleasure to work with,” said Mike McCue, Flipboard CEO (@mike@flipboard.com). “And now, with the Social Web Foundation established, there will be a dedicated organization to foster even greater awareness, collaboration and innovation. We’re excited to be a part of this next wave of the web, using open standards to advance how we connect with each other every day.”

The Foundation will collaborate with other non-profit organizations in the space. “IFTAS wholeheartedly welcomes the launch of the Social Web Foundation and its commitment to a healthy Fediverse,” says Jaz-Michael King, executive director (@jaz@mastodon.iftas.org). “We anticipate great opportunities for collaboration in our efforts to enhance trust and safety, and we look forward to working with the Foundation to strengthen the Fediverse for the benefit of all its communities.”

“The Fediverse reminds us of the early days of the Web. We are competing against silos and corporate interests, using a W3C-based open standard and a distributed solution,” says Jon Von Tetzchner, CEO of Vivaldi (@jon@vivaldi.net). “It’s great that social networking companies are supporting the Fediverse, and Vivaldi is pleased to support the Social Web Foundation so that we can once again have a town square free of algorithms and corporate control.”

“We’re really excited about the launch of the Social Web Foundation,” says Bart Decrem, founder, The BLVD (sub.club, Mammoth) (@bart@moth.social) “This will help accelerate the growth of the Fediverse, which is so important for the future of the open web!”

“It’s time to bring back the open web we were promised, rather than the closed networks we got. We’re very excited to support the Social Web Foundation and collaborate on building a more transparent and constructive future for the internet,” says John O’Nolan, CEO of Ghost Foundation (@index@activitypub.ghost.org)

“As a long-time ActivityPub implementer, Write.as is thrilled to support the launch of the Social Web Foundation,” says Matt Baer, Founder and CEO (@matt@write.as). “With our shared mission of fostering a diverse and thriving social web, we look forward to collaborating with the Foundation, its partners, and community to realize the full potential of publishing on the Fediverse.”

Learn more


The Social Web Foundation can be found on the web at socialwebfoundation.org/ and on the social web at swf@socialwebfoundation.org. Email contact@socialwebfoundation.org.

Als Antwort auf Evan Prodromou

The #NGO path is a mess, but maybe a needed mess.

How to get dancing elephants and paper planes into a “foundation” model

* Do something different - dancing elephants and paper planes.

* Do something normal - control freekery and power politics games.

* Do nothing - maybe it all just carries on or more likely decay and irrelevances.

#Activertypub is the first option, and this is why we love it and are having this conversation.

Some links on this socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/…

Ps. can you post some links to the #openprocess that resulted in this thanks, am interested in documenting how these things happen.

Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag

mastodon - Link zum Originalbeitrag

Adam Lein

a & b) admins snooping on or turning over messages is exactly why your private messages shouldn't be on a public ActivityPub server at all. It should be a completely separate system that you can self-host for privacy (like we can with email). I really like the idea of just a contact form on the profile that uses the existing email notification system to send a private message.
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag

mastodon - Link zum Originalbeitrag

Adam Lein

But it can go one way the other way too! Thus making it 2 ways. 😀 Your risottobias@tech.lgbt address is public already anyway. How is sending messages to that via ActivityPub any different from sending via SMTP? SMTP already has the advantages of a huge spam-blocking ecosystem, multiple encryption capabilities, & vast client/server software options. Inventing a new protocol that does the same thing isn't going to garner that kind of ecosystem overnight.
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag

mastodon - Link zum Originalbeitrag

Adam Lein

The user interface can be changed to anything you want when it comes to open protocols like ActivityPub and Email. What features do people want that can't be done with email? I've seen typing indicators, read receipts, E2EE, video conferencing, 1-click reactions, etc. all implemented with email. The reason Youtube, Instagram, X do things with proprietary protocols is for user control and abuse. That's what we do not want, right?
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag

mastodon - Link zum Originalbeitrag

Adam Lein

I'm trying to understand... How is "send message from 1 person to another" a different purpose than "send message from 1 person to another"? How is "type in your username and password" more misconfigurable than "type in your username and password"?
Als Antwort auf Evan Prodromou

re: Leaders of the open social networking movement have formed the Social Web Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to making connections between social platforms with the open standard protocol ActivityPub. The “social web”, also called the “Fe
i think you got ur content warning wrong. also, fyi, you don't need to add links to users profile when you tag them in a post, adding links is usually pretty annoying because then it opens in a remote instance on most software
Als Antwort auf Matthias Pfefferle

@Matthias Pfefferle @yuki - queen of the snow

I notice that when I (on Friendica) respond to a Mastodon post with a content warning, I get an <abstract> element, and it certainly doesn't act as a content warning. So there seems to be some inconsistency in implementation.

That said, I'm not getting a content warning from this post.

Als Antwort auf Martijn Vos

mastodon uses `as:sensitive` to check if the summary is a summary or a content warning. docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/act…

I really like the idea of the sensitive flag, because to use the summary as a synonym for content-warning harms the spec.

Maybe we have to file some issue!?!

Als Antwort auf Matthias Pfefferle

or maybe it is because the WordPress plugin does not send an `as:sensitive: false` yet. we have a PR for that, I will try to release a new version to see if this will fix it. github.com/Automattic/wordpres…

can I maybe ping you two, to run a test on your instances @mcv @yukijoou ?

Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (8 Monate her)
Als Antwort auf Matthias Pfefferle

@Matthias Pfefferle @yuki - queen of the snow

A sensitive flag sounds like a great idea, but repurposing a summary as content warning based on a flag sounds like a bad idea to me. If there's no explicit content warning field, I think a spoiler tag is a better fit, because that already functions similarly without the flag.

But I'd prefer an explicit content warning field. There's clearly a need for it, and if it's explicit, you could set your client to always show or hide certain content.