How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse)
ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-ki…
How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse)
How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse) écrit par Ploum, Lionel Dricot, ingénieur, écrivain de science-fiction, développeur de logiciels libres.ploum.net
teilten dies erneut
Elireum
Als Antwort auf rimu • • •"The Fediverse is not looking for growth. It is offering a place for freedom."
I'm very thankful for that. Great article.
.& Daniel Tietze ; mag das.
Teal hat dies geteilt.
thebestaquaman
Als Antwort auf rimu • • •.& Daniel Tietze ;
Als Antwort auf rimu • •I am not interested in sharing with Meta. But for the Case of Cases there should be a Bridge or a Hole.
inspired
Als Antwort auf rimu • • •ryan
Als Antwort auf rimu • • •I think the big thing to take away from that article is... XMPP developers cared so much about retaining federation with Google Talk that they "became watchers and debuggers of Google’s servers" as it is put there. Google came in and said "this is our house now, adapt or die."
For our current fediverse, it's important I think, as a community, we put our foot down with Meta and say "no, this is our house. If you don't adapt to us, we don't federate with you. If you deviate from the ActivityPub protocol or our other implementations that we do above the ActivityPub protocol (things like boosts/upvotes/downvotes standards as agreed upon by Lemmy/kbin, for example), you will break federation with us, and we will be okay with that." We cannot become the Meta watchers.
ActivityPub is just a protocol and they can use it. It doesn't mean they have to be compatible with us. Let them have their Twitter/Instagram hybrid application. Do we care that much whether we can or cannot see their posts?